APIs and authentication
Replace deprecated endpoints, obsolete credentials, or unsupported vendor connections.
Migration and reliability remediation
Modernize a critical integration without gambling on the cutover.
Replace brittle scripts, obsolete interfaces, unsupported connectors, or weak authentication with a migration plan that protects live operations and creates a maintainable next state.
The operating risk
The current connection works—until it does not.
A delayed migration leaves the business exposed to a breaking API, credential failure, hidden data error, or integration only one person understands. Modernization is a controlled business change, not simply a rewrite.
- Assess the current workflow, dependencies, risks, and undocumented rules
- Compare native, platform, iPaaS, adapter, custom, and hybrid replacement paths
- Test happy paths, failures, duplicates, and reconciliation before cutover
- Plan rollback, observability, runbooks, and transition to operations
Controlled migration
Understand. Replace. Prove. Cut over.
AssessCurrent state
ArchitectTarget path
BuildParallel capability
EvidenceTest and reconcile
TransitionCut over safely
Modernization scope
Change the weakest part, not necessarily everything.
Scripts and middleware
Move fragile jobs into a maintainable, observable, and documented operating path.
Ownership and recovery
Add alert routing, reconciliation, runbooks, rollback, and a defined support transition.
Connected context
Use case, industry, systems, and offer.
Wholesale & distribution
Legacy ERP and supplier workflows often carry high cutover risk.
View industry context →Legacy and custom
Review supported APIs, files, databases, and bounded adapter options.
Explore integration paths →Integration reliability
Modernization should leave the new path monitored, recoverable, and owned.
Explore reliability →Modernization service
Starting at USD 12,000, with final scope based on migration and operating risk.
View the service →Feasibility and scope
Recover the current rules before replacing the current code.
A brittle integration often contains years of undocumented business behavior. Modernization begins by finding the real dependencies, outputs, exceptions, and manual repair steps before selecting a replacement architecture.
- Current code, configuration, schedules, interfaces, credentials, and deployment ownership
- Known consumers, downstream jobs, vendor deadlines, and undocumented manual workarounds
- Representative source records and accepted destination outcomes for comparison
- A parallel-test, reconciliation, rollback, and cutover window approved by operations
- Named owners for vendor access, business-rule decisions, launch approval, and post-cutover support
Build-versus-buy decision
Repair, replace, or rebuild only what the workflow requires.
Modernization does not automatically mean a custom rewrite. The safest target is the smallest maintainable change that removes the material reliability, security, or support risk.
Repair the existing path
Keep the current architecture when its interfaces remain supported and focused changes can add observability, safer credentials, tests, and recovery procedures.
Move to a supported platform
Use a native connector, automation platform, or iPaaS when it covers the recovered rules and reduces long-term operational ownership without losing necessary controls.
Create a bounded adapter
Build a custom or hybrid path when legacy access, complex state, throughput, or recovery requirements remain material gaps in supported products.
Questions to resolve
Answer the operating questions before implementation.
Review a representative legacy supplier-feed workflow →Can the old and new integrations run in parallel?
Often, but only when duplicate business actions can be prevented. Shadow processing, read-only comparison, or controlled record cohorts may be safer than two active writers.
How is a cutover proven before the old path is removed?
Acceptance should compare defined inputs and business outcomes, cover failure cases, reconcile records, exercise rollback, and identify the owner who approves production transition.
When is a full rewrite unnecessary?
When supported interfaces remain available and the material risk can be removed through focused authentication, observability, testing, documentation, or deployment changes.
Discuss the migration